501(c)(4)-Gate: Shocking IRS Scandal or Business as Usual?

By Merry Balson, Esq.

Over the last few weeks I’ve been glued to the media reports as the IRS scandal, dubbed by some "501(c)(4)-Gate", has unfolded. After all, it is not often that the Exempt Organizations division of the IRS makes national news once, much less multiple times in the same month, focusing so much of the nation’s attention on my line of work. If you’ve followed this story at all, you too might be as shocked as members of Congress were to learn that the IRS has targeted various categories of politically backed organizations applying for tax-exempt status. While I am certainly not condoning this kind of behavior, targeting of groups by the IRS, lengthy delays in processing applications, and seemingly unnecessary requests for information from new organizations seeking exemption is certainly not a new phenomenon. Over the last few decades the IRS has targeted gay and lesbian organizations, credit counseling organizations, housing assistance organizations, family-controlled organizations and anyone else the IRS may think either does not deserve the much coveted tax-exempt status or (in the IRS’ experience) is likely to abuse that status. Remember too that, like many other areas of government, the IRS budget has been cut time and again over the last decade or more. While more senior agents have retired, the IRS has either not filled the positions, or filled them with far less experienced personnel who have not had the luxury of their predecessor’s training. Complaints have mounted for years that the IRS is understaffed and undertrained, that processing times for 1023s and 1024s (the applications organizations file with the IRS to obtain tax-exempt status) have become unreasonably long (up to more than a year at this point for many organizations), and that IRS agents routinely ask for seemingly unnecessary and burdensome information in their follow-up requests to new organizations seeking tax-exempt status, but until now, no one in Washington seemed to notice or have any motivation to make any changes. The singling out of political organizations of any nature would absolutely be inappropriate, but to those of us familiar with the long standing problems with the IRS, if the investigations uncover that an internal practice like this existed, it would not be entirely surprising, and though deplorable, it would certainly not be "shocking" given the IRS’ history. We can only hope that whatever the outcome, this new attention to the IRS Tax-Exempt/Government Entities division will bring about some long needed changes that will benefit all tax-exempt organizations, and maybe too a serious review of whether granting tax exemption to any political organization is an appropriate and intended use of taxpayer funds.

Read more about the IRS’ history of burdening nonprofits in the New York Times article published on June 3, 2013 at New York Times.

IRS Expands Penalty and Installment Payment Relief

The IRS announced that it has expanded its "Fresh Start" initiative to help struggling taxpayers by providing late payment penalty relief and making installment agreements available to more taxpayers. Failure to pay penalty relief applies to two categories of taxpayers: (1) wage earners who have been employed at least 30 consecutive days during 2011or in 2012 (up to the April 17^th filing deadline); and (2) self-employed individuals who experienced a 25% or greater reduction in business income in 2011, due to the economy. To qualify, the taxpayer’s income must not exceed $100,000 for single and head of household filers or $200,000 for joint filers. In addition, the 2011 tax liability due cannot exceed $50,000. To seek relief, the taxpayer must file Form 1127-A, Application for Extension of Time for Payment of Income Tax for 2011 Due to Undue Hardship. Those qualifying for relief will avoid the penalty until October 15, 2012, but will be responsible for interest on the tax until paid. With respect to installment agreements, the IRS has raised the threshold limit to $50,000, meaning that taxpayers who owe up to $50,000 in back taxes may qualify for an installment agreement without having to provide financial information to the IRS. In addition, the IRS extended the maximum term for installment agreements to 72 months.